Sunday, March 26, 2006

 

Desperado...

We wish we were clever enough to add music to our posts. So you'll just have to imagine the Eagles singing Desperado in the background as you read this. Why? Because Sue Kelly, whose spokesman, Kevin Callahan keeps insisting that she's not yet campaigning, has invited Sen. John McCain to a $500 a plate dinner next Saturday at Le Chambord, a fancy French restaurant and inn in Hopewell Junction. What a delicious coincidence that next Saturday also happens to be April Fool's Day!

While we can understand why Sue wants to bask in McCain's aura, we're not quite sure why McCain is volunteering to raise money for Sue. After all, Sue was one of a handful of New York Republicans to vote against McCain's signature piece of legislation, the McCain-Feingold campaign reform bill back in February 2002. The legislation passed anyway, no thanks to Sue.

But here's the real question: if Sue isn't campaigning yet, why is McCain coming to NY-19 seven months before the election? And, perhaps more importantly, will Freedom Fries be on the menu?

Comments:
John McCain, He's no Patriot.
Jonathan Mernit


The Right's Man: John McCain
By Paul Krugman
The New York Times

Monday 13 March 2006

It's time for some straight talk about John McCain. He isn't a moderate. He's much less of a maverick than you'd think. And he isn't the straight talker he claims to be.

Mr. McCain's reputation as a moderate may be based on his former opposition to the Bush tax cuts. In 2001 he declared, "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us."

But now - at a time of huge budget deficits and an expensive war, when the case against tax cuts for the rich is even stronger - Mr. McCain is happy to shower benefits on the most fortunate. He recently voted to extend tax cuts on dividends and capital gains, an action that will worsen the budget deficit while mainly benefiting people with very high incomes.

When it comes to foreign policy, Mr. McCain was never moderate. During the 2000 campaign he called for a policy of "rogue state rollback," anticipating the "Bush doctrine" of pre-emptive war unveiled two years later. Mr. McCain called for a systematic effort to overthrow nasty regimes even if they posed no imminent threat to the United States; he singled out Iraq, Libya and North Korea. Mr. McCain's aggressive views on foreign policy, and his expressed willingness, almost eagerness, to commit U.S. ground forces overseas, explain why he, not George W. Bush, was the favored candidate of neoconservative pundits such as William Kristol of The Weekly Standard.

Would Mr. McCain, like Mr. Bush, have found some pretext for invading Iraq? We'll never know. But Mr. McCain still thinks the war was a good idea, and he rejects any attempt to extricate ourselves from the quagmire. "If success requires an increase in American troop levels in 2006," he wrote last year, "then we must increase our numbers there." He didn't explain where the overstretched U.S. military is supposed to find these troops.

When it comes to social issues, Mr. McCain, who once called Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell "agents of intolerance," met with Mr. Falwell late last year. Perhaps as a result, he is now taking positions friendly to the religious right. Most notably, Mr. McCain's spokesperson says that he would have signed South Dakota's extremist new anti-abortion law.

The spokesperson went on to say that the senator would have taken "the appropriate steps under state law" to ensure that cases of rape and incest were excluded. But that attempt at qualification makes no sense: the South Dakota law has produced national shockwaves precisely because it prohibits abortions even for victims of rape or incest.

The bottom line is that Mr. McCain isn't a moderate; he's a man of the hard right. How far right? A statistical analysis of Mr. McCain's recent voting record, available at www.voteview.com, ranks him as the Senate's third most conservative member.

What about Mr. McCain's reputation as a maverick? This comes from the fact that every now and then he seems to declare his independence from the Bush administration, as he did in pushing through his anti-torture bill.

But a funny thing happened on the way to Guant´┐Żnamo. President Bush, when signing the bill, appended a statement that in effect said that he was free to disregard the law whenever he chose. Mr. McCain protested, but there are apparently no hard feelings: at the recent Southern Republican Leadership Conference he effusively praised Mr. Bush.

And I'm sorry to say that this is typical of Mr. McCain. Every once in a while he makes headlines by apparently defying Mr. Bush, but he always returns to the fold, even if the abuses he railed against continue unabated.

So here's what you need to know about John McCain.

He isn't a straight talker. His flip-flopping on tax cuts, his call to send troops we don't have to Iraq and his endorsement of the South Dakota anti-abortion legislation even while claiming that he would find a way around that legislation's central provision show that he's a politician as slippery and evasive as, well, George W. Bush.

He isn't a moderate. Mr. McCain's policy positions and Senate votes don't just place him at the right end of America's political spectrum; they place him in the right wing of the Republican Party.

And he isn't a maverick, at least not when it counts. When the cameras are rolling, Mr. McCain can sometimes be seen striking a brave pose of opposition to the White House. But when it matters, when the Bush administration's ability to do whatever it wants is at stake, Mr. McCain always toes the party line.

It's worth recalling that during the 2000 election campaign George W. Bush was widely portrayed by the news media both as a moderate and as a straight-shooter. As Mr. Bush has said, "Fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."
 
As a long-time CD 19 resident who has longed for the ouster of Sue Kelly, I was pleased to discover the take19 website. However, I am wondering who you envision as your audience! I would hope that you would want to reach an audience beyond the 25 people who voted for Selendy! However, I fear that your sarcastic, derisive tone (no matter how clever, at times) serves only to turn off those more moderate voters who might be persuaded to support a Democratic candidate in 2006. I believe that take19 would do best to adopt a more objective and analytical tone, which relies upon facts and data to reveal Kelly's overall ineptness and marriage to corporate interests and the Christian-neocon right.
 
Yeah Jonathan, but this appearance by John McC for Sock-Puppet Sue isn't about philosophy, or about consistency. It's about money for Sue, and a Presidential campaign for McC. So in his quest for the brass ring, he'll do anything for those who previously spurned him, and in her desire for the campaign cash, she'll take support wherever it comes from. After all, how is cash raised by McC any worse than say, her Big Oil PAC cash, her Big Tobacco PAC cash, her Beer PAC cash,her Bank PAC cash.
 
Lillian-
With all due respect, Take19 is fact-based. As for the tone, we confess to being a bit snarky. But then again, so are most blogs. We're downright sweet compared to gawker.com. The reason blogs are catching on is because they're written in a more conversational tone. If I want boring writing about local politics, it's readily available.

We are, of course, open to any ideas you may have about topics to write about. Please feel free to send to us at our gmail address.
 
It's really interesting to watch what's happened to Ole Straight Talk John McCain. Now that he's back on the Presidential Campaign path, he's cozying up to all sorts of folks who previously dissed him (and vice versa). Not only is he cuddling with Sue Kelly, who voted against his signature McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform bill; he's also getting chummy with the Rev. Jerry Falwell, at least according to this article in the Lynchburg News Advance. Back in the old days, McCain said Falwell was "an agent of intolerance." Now, we know that Falwell hasn't changed any, so I guess that McC's appearance for Sue means he thinks she's just as acceptable now as the Rev. Jerry. Nice company, Sue.
 
Perhaps we should show up outside the restaurant with picket signs and pick up a little media attention, tying Sue Kelly, John McCain, W, and Jerry Falwell into one nice big story?
 
Considering that repetition seems to work, I hope the democratic nominee (hopefully John Hall) bangs away on how often Kelly votes with Tom Delay. First it was following in lock step with Newt Gingrich, and after he left, she found Tom Delay's trough to feast on.

It should be repeated over and over, "Why are New Yorkers voting with an extreme rightwing Texan? Since when are New Yorkers known as anti-environment, pro-corruption, anti-abortion rights as well as criminalization of women and doctors involved in the medical procedure, and let's not forget anti-Geneva Convention (my World War II vet father would be rolling in his grave over that) and pro-torture. Are these the positions of a compassionate New Yorker?
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?